The SEC argued in a letter to the U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York this week that Tesla CEO Elon Musk nonetheless wants a so-called “Twitter sitter,” and that an earlier settlement settlement between them is absolutely constitutional and legitimate.

Now a centi-billionaire, Musk in 2018 wrote on Twitter that he had “funding secured” to take his electrical automobile firm personal for $420 per share, and that “investor assist” for such a deal was “confirmed.” Tesla buying and selling halted after his tweets, and the value of shares within the automaker, seesawed for weeks.

When the SEC charged him with civil securities fraud in response to these tweets, Musk and Tesla settled, signing a revised consent decree in 2019. As a part of the settlement, Tesla and Musk every agreed to pay $20 million fines, and Musk agreed to relinquish his function as chairman of the board at Tesla for 3 years.

Amongst different phrases, Musk agreed to a “Twitter sitter,” colloquially talking. He was alleged to work with a securities lawyer at Tesla who would evaluate and approve his tweets earlier than he posted them in any occasion when they could comprise materials enterprise details about the corporate.

After they struck this settlement, Musk has repeatedly mentioned that he does not respect the Securities and Alternate Fee, and in a collection of press interviews and depositions urged that no one critiques his tweets earlier than he posts them.

Musk and his legal professional, Alex Spiro, have argued because the settlement that the SEC successfully intimidated Musk into signing it, and that the phrases of even the revised consent decree quantity to “unconstitutional” infringement on Musk’s rights of free speech.

With the enchantment within the Second Circuit, Musk is attempting to unwind not less than some phrases of the sooner SEC settlement settlement.

Earlier this week, Spiro submitted a letter to that court docket in New York saying {that a} jury verdict in a separate, shareholder class motion trial that concluded not too long ago in a San Francisco federal court docket ought to be given consideration within the enchantment. In the course of the shareholder class motion trial, Spiro and Musk satisfied jurors that the Tesla CEO didn’t violate sure securities legal guidelines along with his tweets in 2018.

In its reply letter this week, the SEC argued that “Musk waived his alternative to check the Fee’s allegations at trial when he voluntarily agreed (twice) to a consent judgment.”

In addition they argue the decision in San Francisco “says nothing in regards to the persevering with public curiosity in a negotiated settlement time period that doesn’t preclude Musk from tweeting precisely about Tesla or different subjects, however reasonably requires Tesla to evaluate Musk’s Tesla-related communications earlier than publication, together with by Musk’s Twitter feed — a communication channel designated by Tesla for disclosure.”

The SEC attorneys additionally questioned whether or not there may be any authorized foundation to think about undoing the settlement all these years later.

An oral argument for the enchantment is slated for a while this spring, however a last date has not been set.

Learn the complete letter right here: